Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 Md. App. 576 - Casper v. State

70 Md. App. 576 - Casper v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2022

14 state decisions

8019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · Pointer v. Texas · Dutton v. Evans · United States v. Inadi · Reavis v. Antinore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Casper was free to challenge that reliability with evidence tending to show that the ampules had changed since being certified. Md.Cts. & Jud.Proc.Code Ann. § 10-304(f) (1984). The fact that his ampules were 9 months old, without more, however, went to the weight, not to the admissibility of Casper’s test results. Consequently, the State was not required to offer further proof of the chemical accuracy of these ampules.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Test results produced by a qualified person using certified equipment in a timely manner are prima facie reliable. See Moon v. State, 300 Md. 354, 370 , 478 A.2d 695 (1984).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor----” U.S. Const, amend. VI. .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.