Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 MONT 433 - State v. Cassill

State v. Cassill’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
3
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently March 2013 · most notably State v. Price (2006), Hunsaker v. Bozeman Deaconess Foundation (1978)

30 state decisions

1001924193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Fuller · State v. Howard · Continental National Bank v. First National Bank · State v. Pippi · Delaney v. Framingham Gas, Fuel & Power Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The acts constituting or requisite to the consummation of the offense charged here occurred in two counties, and trial might have been had in either. This case presents a clear illustration of the application of section 11707 [R.C.M. 1921, now R.C.M. 1947, section 94-5605]. Citation of authority would seem to be unnecessary * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “or the acts or effects thereof constituting or requisite to the consummation of the offense occur in two or more counties, the jurisdiction is in either county.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “To the information the defendants pleaded not guilty, and in due time a trial resulted in their conviction. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.