Ely v. Hoida’s Empirical Analysis
1924
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 1994
most recently cited
2 district · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Haas v. Fontenot · Guerin v. Sunburst Oil & Gas Co. · Thorpe v. Helmer · Rinehardt v. Reifers · Sanger v. Craigue
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When Bateman took her mortgage, if she desired to protect herself against prior recorded conveyances or mortgages of the property embraced therein, it was, of course, her duty to examine the records. If she did so and discovered that the Ely mortgage covered lots 17 and 18 in block 1, Lenox addition, even though she actually read this instrument she was under no obligation to pursue her inquiry further. There is nothing upon the face of the Ely mortgage to indicate that there was any mistake or imperfection therein. It contains as plain, simple, and unambiguous a description as can be imagined, and one reading it would have a right to assume that it was correct, and would have no duty imposed upon him to go beyond the record for the purpose of ascertaining that the parties intended to cover land located entirely outside the Lenox addition.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Poncelet v. English
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.