State v. Bourdlais’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 1985
2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Fouquette · People v. Willard · State v. Teeter · Burgunder v. State of Arizona · State v. Lewis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It has been the rule in the State of Nevada, long established and consistently adhered to by this court, that if there is substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury, the evidence will not be weighed by this court, nor the verdict or judgment disturbed. This court cannot reverse the judgment upon the ground of insufficiency of the evidence where there is substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury. State v. Wong Fun, 22 Nev. 336 , 40 P. 95 ; State v. Boyle, 49 Nev. 386 , 248 P. 48 ; State v. Teeter, 65 Nev. 584 , 200 P.2d 657 ; State v. McKay, 63 Nev. 118 , 165 P.2d 389 ; 167 P.2d 476 ; State v. Fitch, 65 Nev. 668 , 200 P.2d 991 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Elias v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.