Indictment, charging the defendant with selling a package of oleomargarine of the same color as yellow butter, in violation of section 1, chapter 115, Laws 1895. Trial by jury and verdict of guilty. The defendant is the agent in this state of Swift & Co., an Illinois corporation engaged in the manufacture of oleomargarine in that state. They ship some of their product to him at Manchester in this county, where he sells it in the original packages as ther agent.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1899-12-05
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1942
2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
¶1
The statute upon which this indictment is founded is not in conflict with the constitution of tins state
(State
v.
Marshall,
64 N. H. 549); and for the reasons given in
State
v.
Collins,
67 N. H. 540, the federal question is not considered.
Plumley
v.
Massachusetts,
155 U. S. 461;
Collins
v.
New Hampshire,
171 U. S. 30.