Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 N.J. Super. 202 - Anderson v. Chatham Electronics

70 N.J. Super. 202 - Anderson v. Chatham Electronics’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
6
states following
January 1995
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 1995

16 state decisions

1001961197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Matter of Goldberg v. 954 Marcy Corp. · Farmers Gin Co. v. Cooper · 1 N.J. Super. 259 - Saintsing v. Steinbach Company · Bobertz v. Board of Education of Hillside Twp. · Bobertz v. Board of Education of Hillside Twp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It must be remembered that Mrs. Anderson's surgical operation was not for a work-connected compensable ailment. Larson points out (1 Law of Workmen's Compensation (1952), § 13.13 p. 186) that even when a trip to a doctor is with reference to a compensable injury, "it should not therefore be necessarily concluded that anything happening * * * in the course of a visit to the doctor is compensable. To get this result, there should be either a showing that the trip was in the course of employment by usual tests [as where the doctor has been designated or the appointment made by the employer], or that the nature of the primary injury contributed to the subsequent injury in some way other than merely occasioning the journey". [at 206, citations omitted].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.