State v. Peke’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently April 2011 · most notably In Re William Wallace, Debtor. Mark Klemens v. William Wallace (1988), State v. Altgilbers (1989)
2 federal appellate · 42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Prince · State v. Quintana · State v. Bassett · England v. United States · 12 Cal. App. 6 - People v. Rowland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(2) No variance between those allegations of an indictment, information or bill of particulars, which state the particulars of the offense, * * * and the evidence offered in support thereof shall be ground for the acquittal of the defendant. * * * “* * * “(4) No appeal, or motion made after verdict, based on any such * * * variance shall be sustained unless it is affirmatively shown that the defendant was in fact prejudiced thereby in his defense upon the merits.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Vallo“Duplicity in criminal pleading is the joinder of two or more distinct and separate offenses in the same count.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gurule
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.