Padilla v. Franklin’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Asplund v. Hannett · Yankee Network, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission · National Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission · Town of Gallup v. Constant · State Ex Rel. Naramore v. Hensley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We conclude that the facts alleged by appellant give him no standing whatever to a review here of the actions of the chief. He asserts no rights other than as a member of the general public. Such is not contemplated by the statute. A person aggrieved must be a person having a direct interest, pecuniary or otherwise, one different from the public as a whole. (Citations omitted). 70 N.M. at 244 , 372 P.2d at 821 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Runyan v. Jaramillo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.