Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 Ohio App. 3d 226 - Desantis v. Soller

70 Ohio App. 3d 226 - Desantis v. Soller’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

101
cited by 101 later decisions
1
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

101 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 101 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably 111 Ohio App. 3d 357 - Kilroy v. B.H. Lakeshore Co. (1996), 83 Ohio App. 3d 757 - Holm v. Smilowitz (1992)

101 state decisions

4901990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Normandy Place Associates v. Beyer · 46 Ohio App. 3d 49 - Roesch v. Bray · 30 Ohio App. 3d 175 - Kebe v. Nutro MacHinery Corp. · 29 Ohio App. 3d 1 - White v. Nemastil · 110 Ohio App. 277 - In Re Estate of Woods

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 101 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * The court may adopt, reject or modify the report; hear additional evidence; return the report to the referee with instructions; or hear the matter itself.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “trial court must undertake the equivalent of a ` de novo ' determination in light of any filed objections, when independently assessing facts and conclusions contained in a magistrate's report. The trial court does not apply the same manifest weight of the evidence standard used in review by courts of appeals.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “: The juvenile argues that the Magistrate's Decision is against the manifest weight of the evidence and there is insufficient evidence to support the Decision. The Court, in reviewing a Decision based on a claim of insufficient evidence, applies the test of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.