70 Ohio App. 3d 453 - Hull v. Mayfield’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““ * * * Payment of compensation or benefits by a self-insured employer constitutes a potential claim against the employer’s coverage. Therefore, it is notice of a possible claim and results in a waiver of the statute of limitations. In contrast, a state-funded insured employer does not waive the statute of limitations by merely paying similar compensation or benefits because it is not the processing agent for the claims of its employees. * * * ””

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 81 Ohio App. 3d 454 - Jones v. Fruehauf Corp. · 143 Ohio App. 3d 125 - Simoudis v. Ford Motor Company

2. ““(A) In all cases of injury or death, claims for compensation or benefits for the specific part or parts of the body injured shall be forever barred unless, within two years after the injury or death: “(3) In the event the employer is a self-insuring employer, one of the following has occurred: “(a) Written notice of the specific part or parts of the body claimed to have been injured has been given to the commission or bureau or the employer has furnished treatment by a licensed physician in the employ of an employer, provided, however, that the furnishing of such treatment shall not constitute a recognition of a claim as compensable, but shall do no more than satisfy the requirements of this section; “(b) Compensation or benefits have been paid or furnished equal to or greater than is provided for in sections 4123.52, 4123.55 to 4123.62, and 4123.64 to 4123.67 of the Revised Code.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 143 Ohio App. 3d 125 - Simoudis v. Ford Motor Company

3. “(2) The employer, with knowledge of a claimed compensable injury or occupational disease, has paid wages in lieu of compensation for total disability. (3) In the event the employer is a self-insuring employer, one of the following has occurred: (a) Written or facsimile notice of the specific part or parts of the body claimed to have been injured has been given to the commission or bureau or the employer has furnished treatment by a licensed physician in the employ of an employer, provided, however, that the furnishing of such treatment shall not constitute a recognition of a claim as compensable, but shall do no more than satisfy the requirements of this section; (b) Compensation or benefits have been paid or furnished equal to or greater than is provided for in sections 4123.52 [etc.].”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 426 F. Supp. 2d 681 - Ritenour v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance