Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 OHIOST3D 114 - Ault v. Jasko

Ault v. Jasko’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

101
cited by 101 later decisions
10
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

99 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 101 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably S.V. v. R.V. (1996), Doe v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati (2006)

99 state decisions — followed in 10 states

6801994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Doe v. First United Methodist Church

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 101 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““1. The discovery rule applies in Ohio to toll the statute of limitations where a victim of childhood sexual abuse represses memories of that abuse until a later time. “2. The one-year statute of limitations period for sexual abuse in Ohio begins to run when the victim recalls or otherwise discovers that he or she was sexually abused, or when, through the exercise of reasonable diligence, the victim should have discovered the sexual abuse.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.