State v. King’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
365 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 366 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably 108 Ohio App. 3d 598 - State v. Mays (1996), 113 Ohio App. 3d 708 - Carroll v. Detty (1996)
365 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · State v. Kelley · State v. Adams · State v. O'Brien · State v. Mincy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 366 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To be effective, an accused's waiver of his or her constitutional and statutory rights to a speedy trial must be expressed in writing or made in open court on the record.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage“[p]ursuant to R.C. 2945.72 (H) a court may * * * sua sponte continue an accused's trial beyond the time limit prescribed by R.C. 2945.71 , but only when reasonable and only when the continuances are made by journal entry prior to the expiration of the time limit.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Consistent with this principle, this court has found the statutory speedy trial provisions set forth in R.C. 2945.71 to be coextensive with constitutional speedy trial provisions. State v. O'Brien (1987), 34 Ohio St.3d 7 , 516 N.E.2d 218 . Thus, we have held that an accused's express written waiver of his statutory rights to a speedy trial, made knowingly and voluntarily, also constitutes a waiver of his speedy trial rights guaranteed by the United States and Ohio Constitutions. O' Brien, supra, paragraph one of the syllabus. Furthermore, this court has held that, for purposes of trial preparation, a defendant's statutory right to a speedy trial may be waived, with or without the defendant's consent, by the defendant's counsel. State v. McBreen (1978), 54 Ohio St.2d 315 , 8 O.O.3d 302 , 376 N.E.2d 593 , syllabus." Id.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Horsley · State v. Watkins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.