Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 OHIOST3D 325 - State v. Webb

State v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

303
cited by 303 later decisions
3
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 299 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 303 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably State v. Treesh (2001), State v. Garner (1995)

2 federal appellate · 299 state decisions

10301994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Chapman v. State of California · State v. Jenks · Ohio v. Roberts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 303 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether the language used was manifestly intended or was of such character that the jury would naturally and necessarily take it to be a comment on the failure of the accused to testify.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hen a defendant `speculates that the grand jury testimony might have contained material evidence or might have aided his cross examination . . . by revealing contradictions,' the trial court does not abuse its discretion by finding the defendant *Page 6 had not shown a particularized need.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “nonconstitutional error is harmless if there is substantial other evidence to support the guilty verdict”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.