Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

70 Or. 81

White v. Geinger

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1914

Oregon Supreme Court · decided 1914-03-17

From Jackson: Frank M. Calkins, Judge. Department 2. Statement by Mr. Justice Burnett. This is an action at law by H. L. White against A. , C. Geinger to recover money in which issue was joined by the defendant, and the litigation proceeded to judgment, which was rendered January 3, 1913. No error whatever is predicated concerning the proceedings up to and including the rendition of judgment.

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 1932

4 state decisions

Relies on State v. McDaniel · Macartney v. Shipherd

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed: Rehearing Denied · Decided 1914-03-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Justice Burnett

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶21. Section 175, L. O. L., says:

"A motion to set aside a judgment and for a new trial, with the affidavits, if any, in support thereof, shall be filed within one day after the entry of the judgment sought to be set aside, or such further time as the court may allow.”

¶3In view of this statute, the Circuit Court could not properly entertain the motion filed more than one day after the trial, without extension of time having been granted: State v. McDaniel, 39 Or. 161 (65 Pac. 520).

¶42. Moreover, as held in Macartney v. Shipherd, 60 Or. 133 (117 Pac. 814, Ann. Cas. 1913D, 1257), no appeal lies from an order denying a motion for a new trial. For these reasons, the defendant has no standing in this court by virtue of his appeal, and the judgment against him must be affirmed.

¶5Affirmed: Rehearing Denied.

Mr. Chief Justice McBride, Mr. Justice Eakin and Mr. Justice Bean concur.
/70/or/81 · .json · Public domain