Caloric Corp. v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
June 1998
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Griffin v. California · Baxter v. Palmigiano · Garrity v. State of New Jersey · Lefkowitz v. Turley · Spevack v. Klein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““not only protects the individual against being involuntarily called as a witness against himself in a criminal prosecution but also privileges him not to answer official questions put to him in any other proceeding, civil or criminal, formal or informal, where the answers might incriminate him in future criminal proceedings.” Lefkowitz v. Turley, 414 U.S. 70, 77 , 94 S.Ct. 316, 322 , 38 L.Ed.2d 274 (1973).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[Although a trier of fact may draw an adverse inference from a party’s silence, such inference cannot be used as a substitute for the employer’s failure to introduce substantial evidence to meet its burden of proving that an employee’s discharge resulted from willful misconduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.