Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 PAD&C4TH 52 - Lewis v. Bayer AG

Lewis v. Bayer AG’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor · Brown v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority · In re American Medical Systems, Inc. · Esplin v. Hirschi · Robin Zinser v. Accufix Research Institute, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[s]tate consumer protection acts are designed to protect the residents of the states in which a deceptive act occurs or the individual resides and therefore the state where the individual resides has an overriding interest in applying the law of that state.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.