Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 S.D. 352 - Tufty v. Sioux Transit Co.

Tufty v. Sioux Transit Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
5
states following
February 1999
most recently cited

52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently February 1999 · most notably Weidner v. Lineback (1966), Ross v. Foss (1958)

52 state decisions

160194519501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 11 Cal. 2d 724 - Mudrick v. Market Street Railway Co. · Hodkinson v. Parker · Schuler v. City of Mobridge · Keyes v. Baskerville · Davis v. Holy Terror Mining Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Very properly, the trial court is clothed with a latitude of discretion in dealing with this issue. As a participant in the original proceedings the trial court is best qualified to accurately judge the forces that shaped the verdict of the jury and can most readily sense the influence of passion and prejudice in an excessive verdict. For this reason, when such a verdict is set aside by a trial court, an appellate court is reluctant to disturb its ruling. For the same reason, a reviewing court should be equally cautious in dealing with a verdict the trial court has approved.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"The damages, therefore, must be so excessive as to strike mankind, at first blush, as being, beyond all measure, unreasonable and outrageous, and such as manifestly show the jury to have been actuated by passion, partiality, prejudice or corruption."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.