Beech v. Parks’s Empirical Analysis
1945
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2005
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Moore v. Littel · Scott v. Crumbaugh · Guild v. Mayor of Newark · In re the Estate of Merrigan · Cromwell v. Cromwell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Before resort may be had to rules of constructional preference, it must appear that a testator has left room for doubt as to his intention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Burns'estate“It is axiomatic that in gathering the intention of the testator a will must be considered as a whole.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.