Wolk v. Leak’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2009
1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 153 Ohio St. 82 - McPherson v. McPherson · Armstrong v. Armstrong · Boyer v. Andrews · Cohen v. Cohen · 82 Ohio App. 255 - Bush v. Bush
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In a suit in this state upon a foreign divorce decree to enforce accrued installments the burden is upon the party defending the suit to make it •appear that under the law of the state of rendition installments for alimony or child support do not become vested when they are due but are subject at all times to amendment, change or alteration. And in the absence of such a showing the presumption must be indulged that there is no such law. Boyer v. Andrews, Cohen v. Cohen, supra.” [ 70 So.2d 500 .]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Edgar v. Edgar
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.