70 So. 3d 1106 - State v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Minnesota v. Dickerson · 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · 433 So. 2d 688 - State v. Smith · 419 So. 2d 475 - State v. Lanclos
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This court reviews a district court's ruling on a motion to suppress under the manifest error standard for factual determinations...while applying a de novo review to findings of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A trial court's decision to deny a motion to suppress is afforded great weight and will not be set aside unless the preponderance of the evidence clearly favors suppression.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.