¶1 We are satisfied in light of the recent order directing the state to respond to the petitioner’s motion for postconviction relief that the circuit court is taking appropriate measures to dispose of that motion. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Munn v. Florida Parole Commn., 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Nonetheless, as we did in Munn, we encourage the circuit court to expeditiously rule on the motion pending before it.
70 So. 3d 615
Paramore v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 4, 2011
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2011-05-04
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 2018
2 state decisions
Relies on Munn v. Florida Parole Commission
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2011-05-04
View the full empirical analysis of this case →