70 So. 3d 89 - Sheridan v. Cassel’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on 977 So. 2d 880 - Samaha v. Rau · 950 So. 2d 544 - Duncan v. USAA Ins. Co. · 870 So. 2d 1002 - Jones v. Estate of Santiago · Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light · 885 So. 2d 540 - King v. Parish National Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]ll of my right, title, claim, and interest, real and personal, in and to the Estate of [Ray] including, but not limited to all real property and all personal property of said estate ... including ... all other properties and assets of said estate, wheresoever located, and of whatsoever kind and nature, and all rights of said estate of every kind and character.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Temple v. McCall“[I]n the April 5, 1969 cash sale deed to [Ray], [Cassel] conveyed ‘all rights’ to the subject 80 acres without reservation of the mineral rights he possessed from the sale of the subject 3.27 acres to the Sabine River Authority ... Thus, [Cas-sel] transferred 76.73 surface acres and 80 mineral acres to [Ray] that remained with her until her death.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Temple v. McCall
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.