Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 SW3D 131 - Ex Parte Madding

Ex Parte Madding’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

42 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In re Oliver · United States v. DiFrancesco · Ex parte Lange · United States v. Benz · Lankford v. Idaho

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is the pronouncement of sentence that is the appealable event, and the written sentence or order simply memorializes it and should comport therewith.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A defendant has a due process 'legitimate expectation' that the sentence he heard orally pronounced in the courtroom is the same sentence that he will be required to serve.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A trial court's pronouncement of sentence is oral, while the judgment, including the sentence assessed, is merely the written declaration and embodiment of that oral pronouncement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.