Cummings v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 2001

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2001-01-23

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2002

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-01-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Marcus Cummings (Appellant) appeals the trial court’s denial of his Rule 24.0351 motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

¶3. All rule references are to Mo.R.Crim.P. 2000, unless otherwise indicated.