Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 SW3D 841 - Willover v. State

Willover v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

97
cited by 97 later decisions
2
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

97 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 97 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably Reyna v. State (2005), Hartsfield v. State (2010)

97 state decisions

550200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Montgomery v. State · Reichelt v. Gates · Romero v. State · State v. Ross · Famor v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In .examining a witness concerning a prior inconsistent statement made by the witness, whether oral or written, and before further cross-examination concerning, or extrinsic evidence of, such statement may be allowed, the witness must be told the contents of such statement and the time 'and place and the person to whom it was made, and must be afforded an opportunity to explain or deny such statement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “need not address the Court of Appeals holding that `when [Rule 801(e)(2)] uses the term `admission by party-opponent,' it includes those of the defendant and the complaining witness.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “what was before the trial court at the time the ruling was made”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.