Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 U.S. 1 - Lovejoy v. Murray

Lovejoy v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis

70 U.S. 1 · 1865

Citation profile

330
cited by 330 later decisions
26
cited 26 times by the Supreme Court
34
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

82 federal appellate · 15 district · 123 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 330 later decisions (26 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2018 · most notably Motion Picture Patents Company v. Universal Film Manufacturing Company (1917), Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. (1926)

82 federal appellate · 15 district · 123 state decisions — followed in 34 states

5001865187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Floyd v. Browne · Church v. Leavenworth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 330 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen the plaintiff has accepted satisfaction in full for the injury done him, from whatever source it may come, he is so far affected in equity and good conscience, that the law will not permit him to recover again for the same damages.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Parties having notice of the pendency of a suit in which they are directly interested must exercise reasonable diligence in protecting their interests, and if, instead of doing so, they willfully shut their eyes to the means of knowledge which they know are at hand to enable them to act efficiently, they cannot subsequently turn round and evade the consequences which their own conduct and negligence have superinduced. The term ‘parties,’ as thus used, includes all who are directly interested in the subject-matter, and who had a right to make defense, control the proceedings, examine and cross-examine witnesses, and appeal from the judgment.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““A judgment recovered in any form of action, is still but a security for the original cause of action, until it be made productive in satisfaction to the party; and, therefore, till then it cannot operate to change any other collateral concurrent remedy which the party may have.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.