Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 U.S. 145 - Fennerstein's Champagne

Fennerstein's Champagne’s Empirical Analysis

70 U.S. 145 · 1865

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
May 1975
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 6 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1975 · most notably Commonwealth of Virginia v. State of West Virginia (1915), Hoffman v. Palmer (1942)

10 federal appellate · 6 district · 8 state decisions

70186518701880189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In reaching this conclusion,” the learned justice continues, “wo do not go beyond the verge of the authorities to which we have referred. In some of those cases the person assorted to be necessary, as a witness was dead. But that can make no difference in the result. 'The rule rests upon the consideration that 1he entry, other writing, or parol declaration of the author was within his ordinary business. In most cases he must make the entry contemporaneously with the occurrence to which it relates. In ail he has full knowledge, no motive to falsehood, and there is the strongest improbability of untruth. Safer sanctions rarely surround the testimony of a witness examined under oath. The rule is as firmly fixed as the more general rale to which it is an exception. Modern legislation has largely and wisely liberalized the law of evidence.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.