Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 U.S. 196 - Blossom v. Railroad Co.

Blossom v. Railroad Co.’s Empirical Analysis

70 U.S. 196 · 1865

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
7
cited 7 times by the Supreme Court
14
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 4 district · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions (7 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2014 · most notably United States ex rel. Goldberg v. Daniels (1913), Pewabic Mining Co. v. Mason (1892)

26 federal appellate · 4 district · 21 state decisions — followed in 14 states

801865187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “before the hammer is down and the offer has been accepted.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Officers appointed under such decrees, and directed to make such sales, have the power to accomplish the object; but they are usually invested with a reasonable discretion as to the manner of its exercise, which they are not at liberty to overlook or disregard. Acting under the decree, they have duties to perform to the complainant, to the vendor and purchaser, and to the court, and they are bound to exercise their best judgment in the performance of all those duties. Such an officer, in acting under such a decree, if directed to sell the property, should adopt all necessary and proper means to fulfil the directions; but he should, at the same time, never lose sight of the fact that, unless he is restricted by the terms of the decree, the time and manner of effecting the. sale are, in the first instance, vested in his sound discretion. Usual practice undoubtedly is, that the officer in selling the property acts under the advice of the solicitor of the complainant; but it cannot be admitted that his advice is, under all circumstances, obligatory upon the officer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.