Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 U.S. 334 - Buck v. Colbath

Buck v. Colbath’s Empirical Analysis

70 U.S. 334 · 1865

Citation profile

377
cited by 377 later decisions
74
cited 74 times by the Supreme Court
24
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

75 federal appellate · 42 district · 69 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 377 later decisions (74 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2020 · most notably Wheeldin v. Wheeler (1963), Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co. (1909)

75 federal appellate · 42 district · 69 state decisions — followed in 24 states

84018651870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Convoy's Wheat

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 377 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A very large and important field for the exercise of his judgment and discretion, first, in ascertaining that the property on which he proposes to levy is the property of the person against whom the writ is directed; secondly, that it is property which by law is subject to be taken under the writ; and. thirdly, as to the quantity of such property necessary to be seized in the case in hand. In all these particulars he is bound to exercise his own judgment, and is legally responsible to any person for the consequences of any error or mistake in its exercise to his prejudice. He is so liable to plaintiff, to defendant, or to any third person whom his erroneous action in the premises may injure.””
    28 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The limitation of the rule must'be much stronger, and must be applicable under many more varying circumstances, when persons not parties to the first proceeding are prosecuting their own separate interests in other courts.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.