Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 U.S. 51 - The Binghamton Bridge

The Binghamton Bridge’s Empirical Analysis

70 U.S. 51 · 1865

Citation profile

156
cited by 156 later decisions
38
cited 38 times by the Supreme Court
20
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 156 later decisions (38 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2017 · most notably United States v. Winstar Corp. (1996), United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co. (1975)

21 federal appellate · 44 state decisions — followed in 20 states

2401865187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 156 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is settled law that in grants by the public nothing passes merely by implication, and if a contract with a state, relating to the exercise of franchises, is susceptible of two meanings, The one restricting and the other extending the powers of a corporation, that construction is to be adopted which works the least harm' to the state/ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “in grants by the public nothing passes by implication”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““* * * We have supposed, if anything was settled by an unbroken course of decisions in the Federal and State courts, it was, that an act of incorporation was a contract between the State and the stockholders. All courts at this day are estopped from questioning the doctrine. The security of property rests upon it, and every successful enterprise is undertaken, in the unshaken belief that it will never be forsaken. A departure from it now would involve dangers to society that cannot be foreseen, would shock the sense of justice of the country, unhinge its business interests, and weaken, if not destroy, that respect which has always been felt for the judicial department of the Government. An attempt even to reaffirm it, could only tend to lessen its force and obligation. It received its ablest exposition in the case of Dartmouth College v. Woodward, which case has ever since been considered a landmark by the profession, and no court has since disregarded the doctrine, that the charters of private corporations are contracts, protected from invasion by the Constitu tion of the United States. And it has since so often received the solemn sanction of this court, that it would unnecessarily lengthen this opinion to refer to the cases, or even enumerate them.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.