Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 U.S. 636 - Younge v. Guilbeau

Younge v. Guilbeau’s Empirical Analysis

70 U.S. 636 · 1865

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
23
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2019 · most notably Stebbins v. Duncan (1882), Thornton v. Rains (1957)

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 41 state decisions — followed in 23 states

1601865187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Convoy's Wheat

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The delivery of a deed is essential to the transfer of the title. It is the final act, without which all other formalities are ineffectual. To constitute • such delivery the grantor must part with the possession of the deed, or the right to retain it. Its registry by him is entitled to great'consideration upon this point, and might perhaps justify, in the absence of opposing evidence, a presumption of delivery.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ * * * we are of the opinion, and so hold that, while the authorities are not entirely harmonious, the great weight of authority is that the recording of a deed to a minor is not such delivery as would pass title to such minor, unless it was the intention of the grantor that such recording was to operate as a delivery, so shown by evidence. “The registry of a deed by the grantor might, perhaps, in the absence of opposing evidence, justify a presumption of delivery, but such presumption is repelled where the registry was made without the knowledge or assent of the grantee, and the property it purported to convey always remained in the possession and under the control of the grantor. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.