State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1896
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently July 1987 · most notably Morton v. United States (1945), Commonwealth v. Richards (1973)
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 27 state decisions — followed in 14 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Pool · Roberts v. People · State v. Green · Patterson v. State · Boyd v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We think the jury could not be permitted to return a verdict of guilty of an assault with intent to murder against all, on the mere finding of a common purpose to resist arrest. It would doubtless be different if it were found that they acted upon a common understanding that they would do whatever might be necessary to avoid arrest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Persuitti
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.