Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 Wash. 2d 513 - State v. Dodd

70 Wash. 2d 513 - State v. Dodd’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently November 2018

3 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

90196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 23 Wash. 2d 155 - In Re Brandon v. Webb · State v. McKeen · State v. Scott · 49 Wash. 2d 98 - State v. Taft

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “defendant's appearance, demeanor, conduct, personal and family history, past behavior, medical and psychiatric reports and the statements of counsel.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If a defendant has sufficient intelligence to rationally choose whether to stand trial, plead guilty, or enter a plea of mental irresponsibility, the choice is his — not that of his attorney — for the constitution gives him the right to appear and defend either in person or by counsel. Const, art. 1, § 22. Whether the defendant possesses requisite mental competency to make a plea of guilty rests largely within the trial court’s discretion, and acceptance and entry of the plea by the court will not be overturned except in clear cases of abuse of such discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.