Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 Wash. 2d 681 - State v. Leevans

70 Wash. 2d 681 - State v. Leevans’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
February 2013
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2013

8 state decisions

30196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 68 Wash. 2d 50 - State v. Badda · 47 Wash. 2d 102 - State v. Lyskoski · 62 Wash. 2d 858 - State v. Harris · 66 Wash. 2d 535 - State v. Miller · 60 Wash. 2d 488 - State v. Calhoun

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As long as the jury remains under the direction of the trial court, it is within the court’s province to have them render a correct verdict. State v. Leevans, [ 70 Wash.2d 681 ], 424 P.2d 1016, 1020 ([Wash.] 1967). “When a verdict is rendered in improper form, is incomplete, is insufficient in substance, is not responsive to or does not cover the issues, or is otherwise defective, the trial court may recommit the verdict to the jury with proper instructions.” Id. See also State v. Culbertson [ 214 Kan. 884 ], 522 P.2d 391, 394 ([Kan.] 1974).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The basis for challenging an instruction which is not urged at the time of trial cannot be considered for the .first time on appeal. State v. Harris, 62 Wn.2d 858 , 385 P.2d 18 (1963). New theories presented for the first time on appeal must be disregarded. State v. Lyskoski, 47 Wn.2d 102 , 287 P.2d 114 (1955).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.