70 Wash. 2d 7 - State v. Saylors’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
37 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently October 2008 · most notably 162 W. Va. 212 - State v. Sims (1978), 95 Wash. 2d 203 - In Re the Personal Restraint of Keene (1981)
37 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 48 Wash. 2d 545 - In RE OLSEN v. Delmore · 57 Wash. 2d 484 - State v. Boggs · 68 Wash. 2d 652 - State v. Kanistanaux · State v. Cimini · 63 Wash. 2d 188 - State v. Nelson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We can admire the adherence to principle that makes a man prefer a 15-year maximum sentence under what he considers a constitutional statute, to a 10-year maximum under one which he believes to be unconstitutional. However, we hasten to assure him that RCW 9.54.020 does not conflict with 9.54.010, and that it is constitutional. We have heretofore pointed out that larceny is not essential to an offense under RCW 9.54.020 (taking a motor vehicle without permission); State v. Nelson, 63 Wn.2d 188 , 386 P.2d 142 (1963); State v. Daniels, supra; and that taking an automobile without the permission of the owner is different than larceny. In re Arquette v. Schneckloth, 56 Wn.2d 178 , 351 P.2d 921 (1960).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Dennis“except as to collateral questions such as the validity of the statute violated, the sufficiency of the information, the jurisdiction of the court, or the circumstances under which the plea was made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.