Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 Wash. App. 13 - State v. Gleason

70 Wash. App. 13 - State v. Gleason’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently December 2011 · most notably State v. O'NEILL (2003), State v. Armenta (1997)

45 state decisions

260199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Mendenhall · United States v. Cortez · California v. Hodari D. · 114 Wash. 2d 304 - State v. Mennegar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`specific and articulable facts giving rise to a reasonable suspicion that the person stopped is, or is about to be, engaged in criminal activity.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “this was the first time the defendant had been seen in the area, the officers did not know what occurred inside the apartment and neither officer saw him involved in the purchase of drugs ..., there was no evidence Mr. Gleason was acting suspiciously, [and] he was not carrying any unusual objects.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[A] police officer who, as part of his community caretaking function, approaches a citizen and asks questions limited to eliciting that information necessary to perform that function has not `seized' the citizen.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.