Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 Wash. App. 286 - Brust v. Newton

70 Wash. App. 286 - Brust v. Newton’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
4
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co. (1997), 87 Cal. App. 4th 953 - Piscitelli v. Friedenberg (2001)

32 state decisions

220199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 103 Wash. 2d 768 - Hartley v. State · 84 Wash. 2d 239 - King v. City of Seattle · Johnson v. Johnson · 122 Wis. 2d 94 - Helmbrecht v. St. Paul Insurance · 104 Wash. 2d 254 - Daugert v. Pappas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he line between questions for the judge and those for the jury in legal malpractice actions has generally been drawn between questions of law and questions of fact.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It involves the question of whether liability should attach as a matter of law, even if the proof establishes cause in fact.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) the request was held objectionable pursuant to rule 36(a), or (2) the admission sought was of no substantial importance, or (3) the party failing to admit had reasonable ground to believe the fact was not true or the document was not genuine, or (4) there was other good reason for the failure to admit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.