Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 Wash. App. 296 - State v. Thomas

70 Wash. App. 296 - State v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 2021

9 state decisions

401993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Coppedge v. United States · Britt v. North Carolina · Draper v. Washington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “constitutionally entitled to a `record of sufficient completeness' to permit effective appellate review of his or her claims.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`place before the appellate court an equivalent report of the events at trial from which the appellant's contentions arise.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “with means of presenting his contentions to the appellate court which are as good as those available to a nonindigent defendant with similar contentions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.