Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 Wash. App. 424 - State v. Summers

70 Wash. App. 424 - State v. Summers’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
9
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2018

22 state decisions

80199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Chambers v. Mississippi · Rock v. Arkansas · Michigan v. Lucas · Easton v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence which establishes a rape victim's inability to understand the nature and consequences of sexual intercourse is not the kind of technical evidence which requires medical testimony to decipher. Unlike evi dence of command delusions, or medical malpractice, or the functions of computers, a witness' comprehension of the basic consequences of his or her actions can be proved or disproved from his or her testimony and testimony as to behavior.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Where the lack of capacity is based on a permanent, organic condition, it logically follows that prior acts of intercourse cannot demonstrate that the victim understands the nature and consequences because the prior acts may have occurred due to the same lack of capacity. The risk of undue prejudice from the admission of such evidence is high, while the benefit to the defense is insubstantial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Evidence which establishes a rape victim’s inability to understand the nature and'consequences of sexual intercourse is not the kind of technical evidence which requires medical testimony to decipher.... [A] witness’ comprehension of the basic consequences of his or her actions can be proved or disproved from his or her testimony and testimony as to behavior.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.