70 Wash. App. 768 - State v. Oksoktaruk’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 117 Wash. 2d 701 - State v. Barnes · 108 Wash. 2d 458 - State v. McAlpin · 117 Wash. 2d 156 - State v. Allert · 69 Wash. App. 133 - State v. Perez · 48 Wash. App. 671 - State v. Clinton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the "more onerous than typical” rationale is a valid aggravating factor, and we further conclude that the use of that factor here was proper. Oksoktaruk’s high blood alcohol level, over twice the legal limit of intoxication, and egregious driving justify the trial court’s decision to treat him differently than the typical defendant who becomes intoxicated and then drives.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“far more egregious than the 'typical’ driving which leads to a vehicular homicide”. The court said the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.