Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 Wis. 2d 280 - Rosado v. State

70 Wis. 2d 280 - Rosado v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

166
cited by 166 later decisions
4
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 164 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 166 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably 119 Wis. 2d 612 - State v. Harris (1984), 93 Wis. 2d 278 - Elias v. State (1980)

2 federal appellate · 164 state decisions

450197519801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 49 Wis. 2d 263 - McCleary v. State · Gregg v. United States · Jung v. State · 21 Wis. 2d 147 - State v. Tuttle · Waddell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 166 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original sentencing, either because it was not then in existence or because, even though it was then in existence, it was unknowingly overlooked by all of the parties.”
    41 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Champion · State v. Doe
  2. “. . the gravity of the offense, the character of the offender [i.e., ‘ “rehabilitative needs of the defendant,” ’ MeCleary, p. 276], and the need for protection of the public.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 75 Wis. 2d 244 - Klimas v. State · 208 Wis. 2d 142 - State v. Carter
  3. “[i]t is well settled that all information relevant to sentencing should be brought to the attention of the trial judge”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Greve · 208 Wis. 2d 142 - State v. Carter

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.