Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 700 A2D 970 - Overbeck v. Cates

Overbeck v. Cates’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2011

1 state decisions

40199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cooper v. Delaware Valley Medical Center · 435 Pa. Super. 93 - Accu-Weather, Inc. v. Prospect Communications, Inc. · 432 Pa. Super. 276 - Schriver v. Mazziotti · Savoy v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co. · 434 Pa. Super. 429 - Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “One who supplies directly or through a third person a chattel for another to use is subject to liability to those whom the supplier should expect to use the chattel with the consent of the other or to be endangered by its probable use, for physical harm caused by the use of the chattel in the manner for which and by a person for whose use it is supplied, if the supplier (a) knows or has reason to know that the chattel is or is likely to be dangerous for the use for which it is supplied, and (b) has no reason to believe that those for whose use the chattel is supplied will realize its dangerous condition, and (c) fails to exercise reasonable care to inform them of its dangerous condition or of the facts which make it likely to be dangerous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.