Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 700 F.2d 117 - McShea v. Schweiker

McShea v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis

700 F.2d 117 · 1983

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
October 2013
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently October 2013 · most notably Purter v. Heckler (1985), Matullo v. Bowen (1990)

20 federal appellate · 5 district ·

3101983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on James Hess, Jr. v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, United States of America · Ferguson v. Schweiker · Adams v. Weinberger · Hicks v. Califano · Cannon v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Nothing in the Social Security Act permits rejection of a disability claim simply because the claimant has not experienced significant end organ damage. [citation omitted] Where there is evidence of alcohol abuse, the Secretary must inquire whether the claimant is addicted to alcohol and, as a consequence, has lost the ability to control its use.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he medical records in this case reek of chronic and severe alcoholism”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “alcoholism, either alone or combined with other causes, can constitute a compensable disability 'if it prevents a claimant from engaging in substantial gainful employment.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.