United States v. Marsh’s Empirical Analysis
700 F.2d 1322 · 1983
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2010 · most notably United States v. Ibarra (1991), United States v. Cardall (1985)
21 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Helfat v. Securities & Exchange Commission · United States v. Healy · United States v. Dieter · Needham v. White Laboratories, Inc. · Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America v. Fairlawn Meats, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The parties have no inherent right to toll the running of the appeal period following the entry of judgment, in the manner of coaches calling time outs in a football game. The purpose of tolling the appeal is to relieve the parties of preparing their appeals when there is still a possibility that a new trial will be ordered....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“When an appeal by the government is authorized by statute, the notice of appeal shall be filed in the district court within 30 days after the entry of (i) the judgment or order appealed from or (ii) a notice of appeal by any defendant. A judgment or order is entered within the meaning of this subdivision when it is entered in the criminal docket.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.