Golman v. Tesoro Drilling Corporation’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2015
1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. Shipman · Loescher v. Parr · White v. Murtha · 365 So. 2d 1285 - Olsen v. Shell Oil Co. · Meyers v. Moody
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In this instance the trial court's order merely established that [the plaintiff] had not met his burden of producing evidence sufficient to place in issue material facts relative to [the dismissed defendant's] fault. It was not intended to foreclose [the remaining defendant's] right to propound an argument. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“It would be inequitable, if not illogical, to hold that [the plaintiff's] inability to produce evidence should redound to his benefit by estopping [the remaining defendant] from relying upon a legally valid defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]n order granting partial summary judgment is interlocutory; it has no res judicata or collateral estoppel effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.