Young v. Callahan’s Empirical Analysis
700 F.2d 32 · 1983
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently June 2024
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Estelle v. Williams · 66 Cal. App. 2d 166 - People v. Zammora · Commonwealth v. Young · Commonwealth v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ecause confinement in the prisoner dock is unnecessary to accomplish any important state interest and may well dilute the presumption of innocence, the Massachusetts prisoner dock must be considered, as a general matter, to be an unconstitutional practice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'Although the restraint imposed is minor, it has sometimes proved a sufficient obstacle so that court officers could reach the defendant in time to prevent escape or harm to others.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Unlike in Bumpus or in Moore, there is no evidence here that the trial court was concerned over security.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.