Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 700 F.2d 467 - United States v. Swayne

United States v. Swayne’s Empirical Analysis

700 F.2d 467 · 1983

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably United States v. Noibi (1986), Driebel v. City of Milwaukee (2002)

24 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

2001983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Spinelli v. United States · Beck v. State of Ohio · Dunaway v. New York · McCray v. State of Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The point of [appellant's] departure and destination [also Miami--known to be a major source of supply for illegal drugs], and most importantly the speed with which he intended to return, belies a belief that this was an innocent traveler”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the courts have recognized that in certain circumstances a person's choice of whom to associate with, as well as the nature of that association, must be taken into account when assessing probable cause”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a]lthough the evidence must be consistent with guilt, it need not be inconsistent with every other reasonable hypothesis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.