United States v. Monaco’s Empirical Analysis
700 F.2d 577 · 1983
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 12 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably Cortez v. McCauley (2007), United States v. Singleton (1998)
36 federal appellate · 12 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Franks v. Delaware · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · United States v. Russell · Hampton v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we may some day be presented with a situation in which the conduct of law enforcement agents is so outrageous that due process principles would absolutely bar the government from invoking judicial processes to obtain a conviction”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“upon proper objection by the defendant, the trial court, if it admits the testimony, must make the [required findings] whether or not the defendant specifically requests the findings.... If the defendant fails to timely object to the proffered testimony, the offer falls under the plain error rule rather than the Radeker rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We think the judge properly refused the motion in limine [to determine admissibility of co-conspirator hearsay testimony] because a trial court has no obligation to determine admissibility of possible hearsay at the pretrial stage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.