Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 700 F.3d 154 - Abbey v. Castille

Abbey v. Castille’s Empirical Analysis

700 F.3d 154 · 2012

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 45 (§ 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority · Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. · Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc. · City of New Orleans v. Dukes · County Court of Ulster Cty. v. Allen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Funeral establishment” means any place or premises duly licensed by the board and devoted to or used in the care and preparation for burial of the body of a deceased person or maintained or held out to the public by advertising or otherwise as the office or place for the practice of funeral directing. 44 “Funeral directing” means the operation of a funeral home, or, by way of illustration and not limitation, any service whatsoever connected with the management of funerals, or the supervision of hearses or funeral cars, the purchase of caskets or other funeral merchandise, and retail sale and display thereof, the cleaning or dressing of dead human bodies for burial, and the performance or supervision of any service or act connected with the management of funerals from time of death until the body or bodies are delivered to the cemetery, crematory, or other agent for the purpose of disposition. 45”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “These rules and regulations shall be consistent with Section 5(a)(1) of the Federal Trade Commission Act [15 U.S.C. 45(a)(1) ], as from time to time amended, any rule or regulation promulgated thereunder, and any finally adjudicated court decision interpreting the provisions of said act, rules, and regulations. This consistency shall be, therefore, the same as the Federal Trade Commission's responsibility over both: 1. anti-trust or other restraint of trade types of activities; and 2. unfair or deceptive types of activities relating to trade and commerce as it affects consumer and business interests.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.