Blitz v. Napolitano’s Empirical Analysis
700 F.3d 733 · 2012
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2342 · 49 U.S.C. § 114 · 49 U.S.C. § 44901 (Aviation Security Act of 2016) · 49 U.S.C. § 46110
Relies on Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority · William Marbury v. James Madison · Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion · Reno v. Catholic Social Services, Inc. · McNary v. Haitian Refugee Center, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a person disclosing a substantial interest in an order issued by the Secretary of Transportation (or the Under Secretary of Transportation for Security with respect to [certain] security duties and powers ...) in whole or in part under [Part A of subtitle VII of Title 49 of the U.S.Code] may apply for review of the order by filing a petition for review ... in the court of appeals of the United States for the circuit in which the person resides....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Ruskai v. Pistole“To determine whether it is “fairly discernible” that Congress intended to bar the district court from exercising jurisdiction in this proceeding, Elgin directs us to examine the text, structure, and purpose of § 46110. In so doing, we have no reason to look beyond the plain text of the statute, in which Congress clearly expressed its intention that any legal challenge to a § 46110 order ... be brought in the first instance in a court of appeals.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[a]ny order, affirmative or negative, issued by the ... [FAA] Administrator under this chapter ... shall be subject to review by the courts of appeals of the United States or the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upon petition, filed within sixty days after the entry of such order, by any person disclosing a substantial interest in such order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.